I’m posting this because I’m sure it will not be picked up in the  general media.  You know the same media that has decided that instead of challenging the claims of  a pending global catastrophe  . . . . they filter any evidence that challenges the powerful liberal environmental establishment.

They were very quick to assert that increased global hurricane activity was the sign of the pending global disaster (remember the reporting after Katrina?) well wouldn’t the opposite also be true?  Decreased activity should mean that the threat is subsiding . . . right?